|
|
||
Terms of UseLicense and Agreement
The ideas and opinions expressed at this web site are freely distributable—the physical tangible arrangement that constitutes a writing, essay, photograph, or drawing is not freely distributable. The writings, essays, photographs, and drawings at this web site are available by license only. What does that mean? Unless specifically declared otherwise:
Additionally:
Good Faith NoticeI have no desire to impose restrictions upon using the ideas I have published here, but I want to protect the results of my labor and how you use my web site. In a world of free association and voluntary exchange, contracts, agreements, licenses, and notices play a critical role in sustaining sanity and order in human interaction. This good faith notice represents my effort to promote such a world. Remember that you too participate in numerous exchanges of products derived from your labor and you want to be treated justly. I am asking you to help build a better world. This good faith notice is not a contract and is not enforceable as a contract. You certainly can pretend to claim you never saw this notice, and I have no idea who you are. This notice is just a notice. I am attempting to deal with you in good faith. I am notifying you of the terms and limitations for how you can use my property. I make no claim or appeal to any statist statutory concept of copyright. Instead I claim author’s rights to my material as expressed in this notice. Statutory copyrights are political privileges, whereas author’s rights are a component of free association and voluntary exchange. Some people will argue that the U.S. federal constitution and statutes have preempted common law copyrights. This would hold true only if one seeks protections under that political umbrella. That is, a person must consent to those protections to render them valid. The common law right to contract and negotiate will always precede any politically granted privileges. This web site is not public or common property and I reserve the right to restrict or limit how you use my property. You are free to distribute and discuss the ideas I have presented here, but you are not free to distribute or duplicate the form in which they are presented except as explicitly defined. Most of the material posted at this web site was created and derived from my personal labor. Some ideas contained in that material might be considered original, but ultimately all ideas are merely synthesized from the ideas of other people. When appropriate I credit other authors as a source for helping me derive my own ideas. Visitors are encouraged to develop their own ideas and improve upon the ideas presented at this web site. Authors, artists, and inventors can claim originality for the results of their labor and ideas they create. Yet, because ideas exist solely between our ears, attempting to “own” an idea is nothing more than an attempt to own and control other individuals. Ideas and words are intangible—existing only in the conditional metaphysical world of our minds. Not being tangible and existing only in our mind means the originator of an idea solely possesses that idea until shared with others. Thereafter ideas are “owned” by everyone, but to be “owned” by everyone is to declare “owned” by nobody. Once shared no one individual can own an idea—regardless of how legalists try to twistify the concept. Not so with physical, tangible objects. Regardless of form or substance—whether traditional hard copy or electronic soft copy—books and other writings are tangible objects existing in the unconditional physical world of matter and energy. Rearranging the physical atomic particles and reducing duplication and distribution costs to almost zero does not change the definition or concept of a book or essay. Please help build a better world. Finis. |
||